Peralta Community College District's Only Student-Run Publication
Peralta Community College District's only student-run publication.

The Citizen

Peralta Community College District's only student-run publication.

The Citizen

Peralta Community College District's only student-run publication.

The Citizen

Laney College Baseball held a naming ceremony April 26 for its stadium, now called the Tom Pearse Diamond. The name change was approved by the Peralta Board of Trustees at its April 23 meeting. (Photo: Marcus Creel/PCCD)
Laney names baseball stadium, FabLab to relocate and more at 4/23 meeting for PCCD trustees
Eliot Faine, Staff Writer • May 15, 2024
Student Trustee Natasha Masand believes her voice has the power to impact the PCCD community.
Student Trustee Natasha Masand finds her voice
Isabelly Sabô Barbosa, Social Media Editor • March 19, 2024
The search for a permanent president of the College of Alameda is down to three candidates. William “Terry” Brown (left), Melanie Dixon (middle), and Rebecca “Becky” Opsata will respond to community questions at public forums on Thursday. (Photo courtesy: PCCD)
Finalists for CoA President unveiled
Community questions accepted until midnight tonight
Desmond Meagley, Staff Writer • May 13, 2024
College of Alameda jazz professor Glen Pearson demonstrates his musical talent on his classroom piano. Hes one of the newest members of the Count Basie Orchestra, a historic 18-piece jazz ensemble that took home a Grammy this year.
The humble Grammy-winning pianist leading CoA’s music program
Desmond Meagley, Staff Writer • March 4, 2024

Judge affirms state citation and fine issued to Community Ready Corps for 2020 Peralta security contract

Zulu Community Protection Services also cited, but did not appeal and has not paid the fine

In a proposed decision issued on Dec. 20, Administrative Judge Karen Reichmann affirmed a citation and $5,000 fine issued to Community Ready Corps (CRC) and its founder, Earl Harper, by the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services (BSIS). 

The citation, issued in August 2021, alleged that CRC misrepresented itself as a licensed security firm when it was awarded a $2.1 million contract by the Peralta Community College District (PCCD) in December 2020. 

Peter Fournier, the information officer for the California Department of Consumer Affairs (of which BSIS is a part), provided The Citizen with a copy of the proposed decision on Jan. 17 with the admonition that “this decision has not yet been reviewed or adopted” by his agency.  

Reichmann’s decision was based on testimony from an administrative hearing conducted online on Dec. 1, 2022. Harper, through his attorney Daniel Siegel of Siegel, Yee, Brunner and Mehta, requested the hearing after an earlier “informal conference” held on Nov. 16, 2021 affirmed the BSIS citation.

BSIS alleged violations of Sections 7582 and 7582.3a of the California Business and Professions Code. These sections prohibit unlicensed individuals from representing themselves as licensees and from engaging “in the business of private patrol operator (PPO)” unless they hold a state-issued license. A PPO license is required to provide security services in the state of California.  

BSIS issued a similar citation to Zulu Community Protection Services and its founder, Robert Dabney, in August 2021 based on violations of the same sections. A $5,000 fine was also assessed to Zulu by the agency. According to Fournier, Zulu did not appeal the citation and has not yet paid the fine. 

Despite numerous attempts to reach Dabney for comment, The Citizen did not receive a response before this story was published. The Zulu website is no longer accessible and visitors now see a “404 error” message in its place. 

The Peralta Board of Trustees approved a $2.1 million contract for CRC and a $2.6 million contract for Zulu Community Protection Services at its Dec. 14, 2020 meeting. Shortly after The Citizen and other news outlets reported that CRC and Zulu did not hold the necessary license to provide security services, the district decided not to move forward with the agreements. An article from The Citizen was entered into evidence in the administrative hearing. 

Siegel argued at the Dec. 1 hearing that the citation was issued to CRC in error, contending that Harper never claimed to have a PPO license, did not offer security services to the district, never signed a contract, and did not accept any payments from the district.

Maretta Ward, the Deputy Attorney General representing BSIS, argued the citation was justified since CRC allegedly violated the statutes by simply submitting a proposal for security and safety services to the district, regardless of whether those services were ultimately provided. While the contract approved at the Peralta Board of Trustees meeting and posted on the Board Docs site did not include a signature from anyone at CRC, The Citizen was able to obtain a countersigned copy from the district through a Public Records Act request. The signature above Harper’s name on page eight of the agreement was inserted using DocuSign and dated Nov. 4, 2020, more than a month before the board meeting.

DocuSign signature on the CRC security contract with PCCD dated 11/4/2020

When The Citizen provided Siegel with a copy of the countersigned agreement via email, he responded by saying “the signature page at the end is not signed by the district, and Mr. Harper’s signature appears to have been affixed by a computer program.”  

When asked by The Citizen about the district’s use of DocuSign for contract approvals, Mark Johnson, PCCD’s Executive Director of Marketing, Communications, and Public Relations, said Adobe Sign is PCCD’s official electronic signature software.  

The Citizen filed a public records act request with the district on Dec 2 asking for all email correspondence between PCCD officials and Mr. Harper related to the DocuSign signature on the contract. More than a month later, the district provided a single email between Atheria Smith, PCCD’s Interim Vice Chancellor for General Services and Anna Jang dated Nov 16, 2020 with the subject line “CRC Security Agreement $2,016,000.” A brief message from Smith referenced the “attached contract” and stated it was urgent and required a requisition. 

Smith’s signature appeared twice on the board approved agreement from Dec. 14, 2020. Nine months later, however, she sent a letter to Sam Stodolski, the Deputy Chief of BSIS, stating that “PCCD has never had agreements of any kind with the subject company (CRC).” The letter, dated Sept. 7, 2021, was provided to The Citizen by Siegel. 

When asked by The Citizen for clarification on these apparently conflicting statements, Johnson said the district had no comment. 

Two witnesses were called during the Dec. 1 hearing. Rico Stephan, an Associate Program Analyst with BSIS, handled the investigation of CRC which led to the issuance of the complaint. Earl Harper, the second witness, testified on his own behalf. 

Stephan faced extensive cross-examination from Siegel on a variety of topics, ranging from contract law to the procedures of the PCCD. Stephan said he spoke with Johnson, acting as a spokesperson for the district, as part of his investigation but was not able to speak with Harper or anyone else at CRC despite attempts to reach them using the contact information on the contract. 

At one point, Siegel asked Stephan if he knew the identity of the anonymous citizen who filed a complaint with BSIS against CRC. Stephan first said he did but, after checking his records, admitted he did not know the identity of this person.  

Siegel speculated it could have been someone from the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office (ACSO) who was “aggrieved by Peralta’s decision to look for private providers.” ACSO had provided security for the district for 20+ years before the Board of Trustees decided not to renew its contract at the end of 2020. 

During his sworn testimony, Harper gave his version of events.

“We were very clear with [the district] that we couldn’t provide security services because we were well aware of the rules,” he said. 

Harper added that CRC was “willing to come in as ambassadors” or “community liaisons” but could do “nothing of the sort” in terms of security services “which is why we never, ever signed any contracts.”  

He also testified the unnamed PCCD officials initially told him a PPO license was not necessary to provide services to the district. 

 “We told them they were and they said no, they are not. We can bring you on as an ambassador,” Harper said.  

Johnson had no comment on Harper’s testimony when asked by The Citizen

Ward chose not to cross-examine Harper. 

In his concluding remarks at the hearing, Siegel pointed out that “the burden of proof is on the agency.” Siegel stated that the “testimony on both sides” confirmed that Harper “never functioned as a licensee” for the PCCD and “never misrepresented his status.” Siegel reprised his argument that “conversations did not reach the level of a contract that was signed by both parties.” 

In her closing argument, Ward stated that the language of the contract clearly stated responsibilities for CRC that went beyond the “ambassador” role described by Harper. She pointed out that licensed professionals in California, whether they be doctors, contractors, or security officers, must be “honest, to demonstrate integrity, and to follow applicable rules.” 

She contrasted that with Harper’s attempt to “engage in a $2 million contract unlicensed and then, when called on it because it’s a violation of the law, offers this court excuses.”

In a follow-up email to The Citizen, Ward advised that “any decision by the Judge is simply ‘proposed’ and must go to the agency for consideration and/or adoption/rejection. It can take up to 100 days or so to become final.”

The Citizen reached out to Siegel for comment on Reichmann’s proposed decision but did not hear back in time for inclusion in this story. 

About the Contributor
David Rowe
David Rowe, Associate Editor
After a 40 year career in advertising, David is considering journalism as his “second act” and preparing himself for that new profession by taking classes at Laney. During his days in advertising, Rowe headed up the media departments for a number of leading ad agencies in San Francisco and Salt Lake City. In this capacity, he was responsible for the planning and placement of tens of millions of dollars of paid media. A high point of his career was placing Intel’s first Super Bowl TV ad in 1997. Rowe has a lifelong interest in journalism dating back to high school in San Jose where he started an underground newspaper called, appropriately enough, The Del Mar Free Press. The school administration threatened to suspend him, so Rowe, with the help of his attorney father, sued the school district in Federal Court and won and injunction. Ultimately, the case was decided in his favor and California state law regarding the rights of high school students was re-written as a result. Rowe is a political junkie who enjoys watching all the Sunday morning news programs and is actively involved in the Joe Biden presidential campaign this year.
Leave a Comment
Donate to The Citizen
Our Goal

Comments (0)

All Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *